Everyone who’s ever been in one is a relationship expert. You can take that line from me and run with it, because it’s so damn true. I’ve been in a few, and still counting, so I’m a certified doctorate holder in Relationshipology.
You probably wouldn’t have guessed from my extensive perusal of Linda Goodman’s Love Signs, Alloy.com’s relationship quizzes, and other such “sources” that I actually have a theory concerning attraction in relationships. Specifically, what factors do we base our attraction on?
1. Brains
You want someone intelligent, who works with you on your level, who gets your deep analysis about things. Even if “things” mean questions such as “How fast can a zombie shamble?” or “What pocket shape is most flattering on a big butt?”
It doesn’t mean that the dumb bimbo is looking for a Harvard professor to boost her ego, or the professor is looking for a bimbo to boost HIS. It just means you gotta be compatible on the brain waves, capisce?
2. Brawn
Is not only restricted to guys. I use “brawn” to mean physical attractiveness – from the neck down. And I’m not saying a specific body type is better than others. If you like tall lanky guys, you like them. If you like small, petite girls, go ahead. I’m not here to elaborate on WHY people have the preferences that they do – I’m just postulating that these preferences form a factor in the overall attractiveness of their partner.
Why do I separate bodies into “neck up” and “neck down”? Oh come on, as if you didn’t already know. A fantastic pair of bazongas can seal the deal for some guys, as long as her face isn’t vomit-inducing. And the fact that Michael Phelps is considered quite a catch (what, of the day?) further bolsters the neck-up-neck-down theory. Have you SEEN him in civilian clothes, sans swim cap and goggles?
3. Beauty
Now we’re talking about the “neck-up” type of good looks. I mean, you’re going to be looking at their face a lot. And unless you plan on taking pictures from the neck down (and I’m not judging you if you do, but it’s bad composition), a decent face counts.
Heck, for some, a decent face is all that matters. Brains can always be engaged with other similar-minded individuals. Bodies – hey, some of us are grateful just to HAVE a body to cuddle with. And besides, everyone’s got the same parts, if you know what I mean. So you see how the face can be a bit of a deal-breaker?
Those are the 3 factors. But what cognitive processes go on in people’s heads when they’re assessing future prospects on these 3 factors? I have 2 postulations, both seem just as likely:
a) Compensation
Compensation is best summed up as “opposites attract”. People seek in their partner the factor that is lacking in themselves, so that through association, they can “have” the same factor.
For example, if I feel I’m very clever and have a great body, but rather a mediocre face, I’d seek out someone who’s good-looking. Or appearance becomes the deciding factor between two otherwise equal competitors. (Totally in dreamland now – no one’s ever had to compete for me.)
In short – whatever you’re lacking becomes the focus for decision-making.
b) Complement
In the complementary theory, whatever you have becomes the focus. Like attracts like. This is especially true when someone has a high societal status based on one of the 3 Bs – you’re famous for that thing, so you need to be with someone similar. Of course, much of it is also due to the fact that people with similar talents and interests will obviously have more opportunities to meet each other, which translates to more couplings. (This sounds like something from my Chemistry lessons on rates of reactions.)
What does this mean for us, the hoi polloi? It’s just as I said above. Some aspect of your personality, such as your job, or your undying passion for Star Wars, is so important to you that you find someone else who reflects that. Or you just spend way too much time on that one thing that you never meet people outside of that circle. Those 2 traits come under “Brains”, by the way. Because, you know, judging people by their bodies or looks is so yesterday.
Standard psychology disclaimer: I would never assert a claim such as “most people are A” or “people with trait X are B”. Human beings are complex, and even a little bit of introspection shows me that I’ve used both Compensation and Complement in my relationships. I’m not here to classify people into groups. I just want to find out what’s going on in our little jelly brains, and share it with the world.
