GEK 1529: Food and Health
Optimistic: A-
Pessimistic: B
In the words of my friend, I am “a hero” who went straight into the paper without reading the cover page. The only time I even glanced at the cover page was to check the module code. Yeah. Usually it doesn’t matter, because the cover page only tells you how many questions and pages there are, and not to open the booklet until told to do so. But for this module, it matters. Why?
Because it was multiple-choice, and I forgot if the paper was negatively marked. Sometimes, in order to prevent students from rolling the dice and picking an answer at random, the lecturers will implement negative marking. If you get an answer wrong, you lose a portion of a mark. Sometimes it’s 0.25%, sometimes it’s 0.5%. In this case, it’s better to leave the answer blank, and have a net score of zero for that question, rather than to take a chance and get a net score of -0.whatever. Unless, of course, you are able to tilt the odds in your favour by eliminating some of the answer choices.
But the above discussion is moot now, isn’t it? Because I don’t know if it was even negatively marked! I didn’t even think about that issue until I was walking out of the exam room. Yeah, all hail the conquering hero. I was too busy trying to finish early so I could beat the crowd.
I didn’t do too well on the continuous assessment for this module either. I only got the grade for one project (out of three) and it was a miserable B. There were a few A- projects in the pile, so I was quite disappointed. In hindsight, I should probably have taken this module more seriously – as it is, I don’t think I spent extra time on the workload apart from attending the lectures. I certainly didn’t do much reading, because the subject matter seemed so easy.
Will this one continue the A- tradition of the science modules before it? Will it be the one that crashes and burns? Ah, it’s too early to tell, and too late to lament. Who cares, it’s the last science module I’ll ever take. I’m done with Breadth modules for my NUS career.
PL3233: Cognitive Psychology
Optimistic: A-
Pessimistic: B-
I don’t think I did that badly, but I doubt I’ll get a very impressive grade for this. I scored high in the midterm, but my term paper came back with a borderline B+ which could indicate either the worst of the best, or the best of the mediocre.
This is a highly technical module, with jargon like “bottom-up processing” and many, many theoretical models to remember. But it’s a core module, my last one in fact, and I had no choice but to take it. Ok, so I had a Hobson’s choice – I can delay taking it and stay longer in school, since I need it to graduate. If it wasn’t for the issue of tuition fees needing to be paid, heck I’d stay an extra year and delay the inevitable growing-up process of getting a job.
The paper wasn’t all that bad, it has quite a unique structure among psych papers in that there’s a section where you can earn 25 easy marks just by regurgitating the glossary. After that is a focus question where you hope your favourite topic comes out, then a “global integrative question” where you have to distill the essence of the textbook to score. Whoops. 13 years of education only trained me to regurgitate, I’m no good at this integrative stuff. I probably came out with a load of incoherent rubbish towards the end, I was writing frantically as the clock ticked away.
And what is up with the lousy quality of the exam booklets? They must have been printed 10 years ago, the staples were rusty and the paper was that rough, thin kind I used to get in primary school for scribbling on. Is this what we pay ever-increasing tuition fees for? Sheesh.
LAJ2201: Japanese 2
Optimistic: A-
Pessimistic: B
The whole semester, I’ve been lamenting my choice to proceed with Japanese Language 2. Japanese 1 was a doddle, so I thought level 2 would be the same. Nuh-uh! The verb forms increased exponentially, and grammar points and their exceptions suddenly popped up all over the place, forcing me to reconsider my opinion that “Japanese is such a nice and regular language, unlike English with its many deviations”.
I merely did all right on the midterm, wobbled my way through the continuous assessments and kept getting back homework with aggressive red crosses. No good. And flunking the oral exam did not help my case, so the final exam was the last chance for me to redeem myself (and minimize damage to the Vital Statistic).
It was a daunting task. The listening comprehension was more like uncomprehension, they spoke so quickly that we couldn’t process the information. I struggled through the reading passage, one whole page of squiggles that I had to decipher. And grammar. Woohoo, grammar, and our tricksy little particles that, like identical twins, loved to switch places and confuse us. And there was a writing component! Great. Awesome. I have to create a story out of practically nothing, structure it in a coherent manner, and maintain grammar while I’m at it.
But hey, I love a challenge. Bring it on! I honestly think I did quite well on the writing bit. I was actually proud of it, at least it wasn’t a misshapen linguistic creature like my previous attempts. Too bad it was only worth 6 marks, I could have really boosted my grade. The bulk of the marks were in the listening and grammar section, pity. So all in all, I’m still looking at rather a pathetic grade come late December.
I’m very, very sure about one thing though. I’m not taking Japanese 3!
PL3880B: Emotions
Optimistic: A
Pessimistic: B
My only morning paper, thank goodness. Waking up before 8 is not my idea of fun. Plus the fact that it was at nearby LT11 eased the pain a bit. Although LTs are generally not great places to take exams, because the seats aren’t all that ergonomic.
I puzzled several people at breakfast because I sat alone in a corner, pau in one hand, tugging on my hair with the other. Hey, if there’s one thing I’ve discovered during this trying period, it’s that I have strong hair. It doesn’t come out that easily, not that I need anyone to try… yeah so several of my friends passed by and wisely decided not to interrupt me. My boss told me later that I looked “intense”. Well yes, that would be the word to describe me when I’m looking at 8 pages that will make or break me. I condensed my lecture notes and readings into 8 handwritten foolscap pages, and I was trying to cram them all in over breakfast.
Did it help? I don’t know. Perhaps as a coping measure, and as a way of reducing anxiety, it did. But it was more of a rehash of the reading I did the previous night, rather than trying to memorise entirely new material. That, I assure you, is a route to failure.
The paper itself was quite all right, actually. I had lots of material to work with. In fact, 5 minutes before the end I realised I had one more point to write about, but I couldn’t fit it in anywhere so I just let it go. I actually spent more than 30 minutes just sitting there, pencil in hand, scribbling away on the question paper. I was just dumping everything I could remember before it flew out of my head, and since there were only 2 essay questions to tackle, time management wasn’t a huge issue.
You’re not really supposed to spend that much time on planning, but I’m the type who starts writing and doesn’t stop to consider the flow, so I need to work out the flow beforehand. The writer in me rebels at the thought of creating a badly-structured paper, and besides, a flowing paper is easier to read -> higher marks. I hope.
So yeah, I think I’ll do okay on this one. My tutor said we’re all getting high marks for class participation, but “high” to him doesn’t quite mean the same thing to me, so we’ll see. I guess the term paper was all right – it’s the only one I didn’t mess up this semester. There are some pretty brilliant people taking the module this semester – 2 of them are the lecturer’s research assistants – so that might depress the curve a bit. But I’ll settle for an A-, I don’t think it’s any more or less than I deserve.
PL3244: Adolescent Psychology
Optimistic: A-
Pessimistic: B-
Boo, I did badly on the continual assessment for this. Hence the lack of faith. But the final wasn’t all that bad. No nasty surprises, the lecturer had pretty much told us what the format of the questions would be like. It was just a matter of guessing the right topics to mug for.
I broke some record of some sort by spending 40 minutes, sitting there quietly planning out my essay. And I knew I was taking a long time, too. But because he’d emphasized the importance of a well-articulated essay, I figured it was worth the time. Besides, I had that annoying feeling of having an idea dart across my mind, only to elude the grasp of my language skills. I couldn’t quite put some ideas into words, until it was too late.
The compulsory question was an agree/disagree one, in the style of my beloved GP questions, so not much trouble there. I did feel a bit shaky about one of my points – it wasn’t very well articulated – but again, there was no space to fix it so I had to let it go.
The optional question was between a “discuss” question, and an integration question. I decided to go for the integration one as I figured it was easier to come up with points, since it was more general, and also because I didn’t think many people would attempt it, giving me an edge. It was a bit weird in places as well, and I probably didn’t substantiate certain points as strongly as I should have. But time constraints are the biggest problem in any examination, so I had to deal.
All in all, I guess I did ok. I feel vindicated, after that fiasco that was my term paper. I think an A is pretty much out of reach, and there’s always a chance that I crashed and burned by writing a perfectly off-topic essay – those questions are trickily worded. But hey, it’s over, I’m free, and until Boxing Day comes around, exams and school don’t exist in my mind.